Good Reads: What I'm reading

Jamie Smith put me onto Great Reads.  I just opened an account and will endeavour to log what I am reading over there at www.goodreads.com/jasonclark.

Reclaiming the female half of God's image

I was reading earlier today the aims of this writing project:

Wikiklesia: Volume Two will re-examine and re-imagine the roles of women of faith. The purpose of "Taking Flight" is four fold:

* To inspire and challenge. Many in religious circles may agree with the idea of equality in theory and in theology, but often bias and discriminatory practice persists. Even in the most progressive religious circles, women’s leadership is not encouraged nor are women’s contributions acknowledged equally. Volume two, with integrity and grace, poses new perspectives for Christian leaders.
*  To inspire women to take flight using contemporary and historical examples. Women of faith represent a latent army of world changers and advocates, that if inspired could affect the world in dramatic ways. An unprecedented, historic window of opportunity is opening at this time.
*  To inspire balanced gender participation and representation within Christian community. Faith communities are undergoing change. People are slowly migrating toward a more experiential and participatory settings which de emphasizes hierarchically dominant structures. The opportunity to pursue and implement decentralized structures will not be fully realized without fully integrating women’s perspectives.
*  To offer a renewed apologetic to those outside the faith. It is abundantly obvious from “secular” practice that women are equally gifted for service and world leadership. The church must broaden and renegotiate its theological anthropology to recognize the radical nature of Jesus valuation of women and thus take its right place in the world.

Looks like some wonderful writing and work here, and you can read the detailed abstract here, and order the book from via here.

The Big Society: How should Christians engage in partnerships with government?

So David Cameron launched the new government initiative of The Big Society.  Where I live has been chosen to pilot applications by local communities for government money for their projects.  In the hope to devolve power to local communities, and to give them resources to do what Government cannot do, and in the current climate can't afford to do.

The Evangelical Alliance UK, have contacted UK churches encouraging them to make the most of this possible initiative.  I've just asked to meet my local MP to explore what this might mean for our church and its community projects.

How do churches navigate this initiative and think through some of the issues of what working in partnership with local government entails? Churches are the largest national group of volunteers in the UK, able to bring to every community, the most important important resources for community...people.

But how do churches avoid naively being swallowed up and hijacked by the dominant UK secular anti christian political agenda, and at the same time not miss out on what could be the most amazing time and space for engagement with community?

A great place to start is with the book by Luke Bretherton, 'Christianity and Contemporary Politics'.  I wish this book have been around when our church plant started it's community projects and partnerships.  But I think this work is almost prophetic for helping churches navigate this new possibility.

Churches need to do the hard work of reflecting carefully how they understand their role and place in society as they approach this project.  Luke maps out how churches are usually 1) Co-opted:  one self interest group in civic society, working with others 2) Competitive:  Using the language of 'rights' and 'freedoms' to express themselves publicly and 3) Commodified:  a private lifestyle choice, in the market place of clubs and societies.

Of course Luke argues that all these are unhelpful and that there is better way to understand church in relationship with society.  Luke shows how if Churches don't think through this role and relationship that when they get involved in local politics and government partnerships, several problems ensue.

1)  Co-ercive:  Churches are forced to stop religious practices and identity to enter into partnerships, losing their focus on people as whole and spiritual being, and losing integrity in the process
2) Mimetic:  Becoming like the state and other professional bodies, seeking to be 'effective'
3) Normative:  The people in churches who take the lead in these partnership become professionalised, and distant from the church communities that enable their partnership in the first place (this was the most painful example with a project in our own church, that broke away from the church once established)

In summary partnerships by the state with churches can cause social conflict rather than achieve a common good, with the aims and values of churches being undermined by them.

Read the rest of this post »

Personal Religion, Public Reality?

Slipstream (EAUK) put me onto this new book by Dallas Willard, 'Personal Religion, Public Reality?' with their review.  Slipstream are also carrying an interview with Dallas Willard here.

I'm a big fan of Willard, his books have inspired me.  I heard him speak in 1999 at a Vineyard Church young leaders event, on belief and doctrines, about how we know
and form practices around belief.  It was...well life changing.

From the review of the book:

"Serious and thoughtful Christians today find themselves in a quandary about knowledge, on the one hand, and religious belief and practice, on the other. It is a socially imposed quandary. In the context of modern life and thought, they are urged to treat their central beliefs as something other than knowledge - something, in fact, far short of knowledge. Those beliefs are to be relegated to the categories of sincere opinion, emotion, blind commitment or behaviour traditional for their social group. And yet they cannot escape the awareness that those beliefs do most certainly come into conflict with what is regarded as knowledge in educational and professional circles of public life. This conflict has profound effects upon how they hold and practise religious beliefs and how they present them to others. Those effects are most clearly seen, on the public stage, in the repositioning of Christian teachers and leaders during the last century. They have been left to preside over the rituals of one or another cultural sub-group that, from the viewpoint of received knowledge, is nothing more than a sociological phenomenon - an 'opiate' of certain people - having nothing to do with knowledge of a reality with which all human beings must come to terms."

My top 20 books

I had a great afternoon yesterday at the London School of Theology, with about 20 canadian baptist pastors.  Anna Robins asked me to present/input around the topic of Emerging Church.

 
At the end of the session, Anna asked if I could email her my top 10 book suggestions including the ones I had already mentioned during the conversation.  Now I've sat in my office early this morning pondering how on earth to come up with a list of 10 books and instead landed on 22.
 
So here are the 22 most influential books in my life, some that are popular level, some slightly academic, some academic, some Christian, some not.  As I looked at my book shelves I asked myself, which books had shaped and inspired my thinking and practice of church, as it relates to issues of church and culture.
 
So here they are.  What would your top 10 be?
(download)

When to quit and when to stick?

Out of all the books I am currently reading, I found two on my desk at the same time, that were in striking contrast to each other.

 
Firstly, Seth Godin's, 'The Dip'.  Less than 100 pages, and I read it on a morning off, in one sitting over two cups of coffee.  One simple idea, that we quit when we should't and don't quit when we should and how to know the difference.
 
A book so simple, that is seemed bizarre no-one else had written it, or for me to have realised the obvious contained within it.  But then all great and simple books seem that way.
 
It left me thinking about some of the dips I am in currently and want to persist through:
 
1.  Exercise and Weight: After 3 years, losing 50lbs in weight, and training regularly I'm much healthier, but stuck in a 'set point' that I can't seem to get through.  I'm in a dip through which I must continue.
 
2.  PhD: Three years into a 6 year track, overwhelmed with workload, a child with special needs, teenagers who I want to be around more for, and I am in a huge dip.  Wondering if this will ever end.  But Mr Godin helped me see that this is a normal dip, and reasons for keeping on, keeping on.  
 
3.  Church:  Church planting has so many lows and highs, and plenty of dips.  The tidal wave of consumer life that demands attention for everything like a black hole, seems to make the idea of building a community who do life together almost impossible.  I'm in a dip (more than the church), and realising that prayer, and faith, and persistence are what's needed.
 
Thank you Mr Godin.
 
Contrast that with another book I have just read, 'A Mad, Bad, and Dangerous People?: England 1783-1846', by Boyd Hilton.  760 pages, a life's work that is so dense and profoundly perspicacious that is sits mockingly next to The Dip.  Impossible to write, not a times best seller, and probably read by a handful of people.  Yet a book that helped me see my life in the context of the history of my own country and my faith.
 
 
 

   
Click here to download:
When_to_quit_and_when_to_stick.zip (23 KB)

Jesus Manifesto: Len Sweet & Frank Viola

I was sent an advanced copy and asked to review the new Len Sweet and Frank Viola book, 'Jesus Manifesto', that goes on sale today.

The dust jacket commendations read like a 'whose who' from the Christian world, and there is little I can add to those luminary accolades.

Rather than a quick soundbite to recommend the book, I thought I would read it and provide a more detailed response.  

Len Sweet was the inspiration and lead teacher for my Doctor of Ministry Course whilst Frank Viola I don't know.  I have always been less than taken with Frank's previous writing seeing it as being historically and methodologically fatally flawed (for example see this critique).  And I write that not to be personal just honest about some of my interactions with these authors, before I crack the book open.

The premise of this book is bold and upfront, claiming to offer a third and forward way between the left and right of how Christians and churches are currently responding. Although it doesn't initially detail what those left and right ways are, given my own hopes for a tertium quid of Deep Church, it grabbed my attention and sympathies

That third way, is immediately offered as being the person of Jesus and suggestion that the book is 'fresh Christology', for that third way.  Plenty of Christians make the claim that all we need is a new focus on Jesus, so nothing new there, so what is the focus of their Christology that make this a real third way, and not an old way re-packaged?

In essence I heard two things with regards to that question.  Firstly that the existing church has too often had Christological heart failure, becoming about so many things other than Jesus, and that secondly many of the alternatives to traditional church are being shaped by so many things other than Jesus too.  

A Christianity centred around 'leadership' or 'worship' is just as much in danger as one focused solely around 'justice'.  There is a gentle and yet stinging critique of how we are using the language of previous cultures and now emerging cultures to shape who and what we are, instead of the language of identity in Christ.

Read the rest of this post »