The Emerging Church: Another Dead-End or the Hope of the Church?
15 Nov 2006

This was the title of my talk at Fuller on 1st November. My new straight to ipod recording equipment failed me, so no MP3 I’m afraid. I am turning my notes into a paper, and will serialise it as well here. Meantime here is a review from one of the students at the seminar for one of Fuller’s newsletter.
————————————–
FSC‘s first “Conversation on Cultureâ€
11/1/06: Jason Clark
Evangelicals are often chided by outsiders (rightly sometimes) for being narrow-minded, one-sided and anti-intellectual, too staunch, too conservative, and too vociferous. They’re self-protecting, arrogant hypocrites who forget about who Jesus really was and is, we’ve all been told. As such, and at an evangelical institution such as Fuller, one might have forgiven Jason Clark of Emergent UK for the opposite kind of harshness, had he unequivo- cally lauded the emerging church and condemned those uncertain about this socio-theological phenomenon that is never quite adequately ex- plained. In his presentation, titled “The Emerging Church: Another Dead-End or the Hope of the Church?â€,
Jason dealt with both of these evangelical responses to it. On the one hand, among those who consider it a dead-end, are both those who view it as an irrelevant move- ment soon to die out, and those who view it as another heretical outburst whose dying out (or squashing!) needs to be sped up. On the other hand are those who see it as the hope for the church.
But a one-sided posterboy Jason was not. Rather, Jason discussed the nature of the emerging church as a sociological and theological movement by tracing some of its philoso-phical and cultural influences. He then continued by pointing out its strengths, its weaknesses, and the way forward for those who see it as a breath of fresh air.
In any cultural milieu, says Jason, those who proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ are tempted by alle- giances that ultimately accommodate the gospel to the world – we dress up the gospel in clothing more accept- able to its “cultured despisersâ€. Although cognizant of the way in which modern Christianity was co-opted by foreign assumptions about what it means to be and to know, and himself critical of the fruit of such allegiances, Jason is wary in giving postmodern sensibilities the same weight as gospel claims, at least in the church. “We might engage in post-modern cultural apologetics but are we in danger of a post-modern enculturation … where we are captive to post-modern thought rather than the Bible?†asks Jason.
He gives examples: viewing the church’s mission as mere response to culture’s questions (a la Tillich); seeing the church as, at best, an optional add-on for the Christian life or as, at worst, a stumbling block in the way of people’s genuine journeying toward Jesus; and despising any and all particularisms in favor of more unbiblical universalisms.
Having leveled such a strong critique at the emerging church, what could Jason possibly say is the way forward for it? Perseverance?Abandonment? He points to five things the emerging church will have to become in order to correct its own potential and actual lapses: First, it must become a deeper church by valuing old, new and even Christian faith.
Second, following the example and work of such theologians as Stan Grenz, Jon Franke, Scott McKnight, and Ray Anderson, it must become a theological church by developing a theology robust enough not to be either threatened or co-opted by postmodernism.
Third, it must become a Biblically-informed church by reading and re-reading the Bible as the church- and culture- critiquing set of authoritative texts that it is.
Fourth, following the ancient church on the road to depth, it must become a creedal church, checking the individualistic impulse towards fashioning the church in the image of ourselves.
Fifth, it must become a confessional church, not to celebrate sectarianism, but to show the richness and vitality of a deeper church. “Maybe then,†says Jason, the emerging church’s legacy will be that it was “the response of the church catholic to our emerging culture … known for it’s vibrant ecumenical depth, with a life giving theology, rooted in a new Biblicism, growing counter to our individualized culture, as it affirms the creeds, with a plurality of local confessions from communities growing in faith, with new Christians handing their lives over to the way of Christ.†We can only hope the emerging church will have such an impact.
- Justin Ashworth
MAT-BST student and
FSC Program Coordinator
The environment in which Christian leaders and pastors minister is both
ever changing and vitally important. “Conversation on Culture†is FSC’s
new way of addressing this reality
Tagged: Emerging-Church, Theology
7 comments
Trackback
Comment by marc
9.24 am on 15 Nov 2006
Great review…I have never considered you as a poster boy though:)
If this was an album review I reckon it would be 4 stars…
Jason clark – emerging church****
Comment by Paul
10.56 am on 15 Nov 2006
Thanks Jase.
Reminds me of something of Andrew said in his talk on Church Fathers, that, despite different localities, languages, their own independence the bishops were in commune with each other and one outcome of that communing was the creeds that we have.
I think we need that communing as you point out, the emerging church has the weakness of being me and my response to my culture, with a plethera of indiivdual definitions. We need to be in commune with God, our own and deeper church community and have expressions, theology that transcends the “me church” and makes it “our” church…
Comment by Paul
10.57 am on 15 Nov 2006
ps – like the picture of you and your new glasses ;)
Comment by molly
6.08 pm on 15 Nov 2006
GREAT thoughts, Jason. Well said.
When I first started poking around in the emerging movement, I had two reactions. One was, “Woah, this (finally!) explains why I don’t *fit* in modern/traditional church!” …but number two was, “But I can’t join something like this (Emergent).”
While I appreciated the voices and nodded my head at the questions being prodded, I could not be a part of something that appeared to shy away even from creedal doctrine, that seemed to be shrugging shoulders at the Scriptures. (note: this was my perception, however I realize it may not be true)…
So for a while there, I was incredibly disappointed, thinking that I’d found fellowship and/or a home of Believers in a way…and yet not.
Then I discovered a whole movement of emerging folks like me, not willing to throw off the creeds, the Scripture, yet looking at their culture and saying, ‘How does Jesus look in this place? What reaches into these hearts, and how can I be a part of that?’
And then I got excited. :)
Comment by Phil Harrold
6.53 pm on 15 Nov 2006
Read something like Aaron Milavec’s recent commentary on the Didache– a 1st- or early 2nd-century “church manual” and you’ll see just how creative, edgy, radical,… and, yes, EMERGENT, the ancient church was.
There’s plenty there and elsewhere in our history to fire the imagination and open new pathways of ministry/mission into our cultural surround.
Like Jason– I think there’s lots of “deep church” wisdom out there… embodied wisdom… you know, the sort of thing Paul had in mind when he said to the Thessalonians: “stand firm and hold to the traditions we passed on to you” (II Tess. 2:15)
Thanks, Jason, for calling emergents back into the Great Tradition (or is the Great Conversation?)
Pingback by emerging mosaic » Blog Archive » emerging church dead end?
3.43 pm on 20 Nov 2006
[...] It may be self serving but I am encouraged wen I see others speaking out for a post emergent future for the emerging church. Here is a snippet of a review from a talk given by Jason Clark titled The Emerging Church: Another Dead-End or the Hope of the Church? First, it must become a deeper church by valuing old, new and even Christian faith. [...]
Comment by Sivin
1.08 am on 21 Nov 2006
good to see you are making necessary waves! :-)
Comments are now closed.