What XP really looks like on a mac
8 Apr 2006
A revised version of the apple intel chip add, with a revised and much better ending. This made choke on my morning coffee:-).
8 Apr 2006
A revised version of the apple intel chip add, with a revised and much better ending. This made choke on my morning coffee:-).
3 comments
Trackback
Comment by Des
11.51 am on 8 Apr 2006
The problem is Jason that Mac users always poke fun at Windows PCs because Macs are cool and look good, easy to use etc.
BUT with my XP machine, glitchy though it may be, I am compatible with everything I need to be in the world. Also, if I want to upgrade my machine I know I can spend £300 – £400 on a new motherboard, processor, graphics card and memory and I will have a stonking PC that would knock all but the top end Macs into a cocked hat. I don’t have to go out and spend £1200 on the latest Mac.
Everything for the Mac costs a fortune, even the litte accessories are about 3 times the PC equivalents.
Comment by Paul
8.43 am on 10 Apr 2006
I’m sure there’s some great illustration here about how we can agree to disagree and still all feel that we’re right… but enuff about theology – come on a Mac :)
Comment by Craig
9.55 am on 17 Apr 2006
That is the saddest video I have seen. The sadder part is that windows users running XP on the a new intel mac think it is fantastic. I know this debate becomes emotional, but XP users suddenly discover the elegance of truly integrated hardware and performance on the Mac. Small step to the full user experience—do yourselves a favour and embrace it ALL.
Comments are now closed.